Notes
Again, the shadows and highlights are very well preserved in this shot. I had forgotten how well these lenses performed sharpness- and contrast-wize. This part of the experiment has been a great success. So how about the ADOX and stand development? I find that these negatives have an extended range over the Ilford films I use normally. Is it the ADOX film, or is it the stand development? I have only this shot to compare it against which I took on ADOX but developed the normal way. Although the ADOX is performing there well and it is difficult to compare these different types of subjects, I think the stand developed photos do have an improved range. I need to test a little more, but the results have been satisfactory, another success!
ADOX CHS ART 25 stand developed: Pre-soaked for 5 minutes followed by Rodinal developer in a 1+150 dilution, agitated for the 1st minute and then left to stand for 1 hour.
Camera & Exposure Information
| PENTAX MZ-S | |
| Focal Length: | 50 mm |
| Aperture: | f/22 |
| Exposure: | 1.5 sec |
| ISO Speed: | 25 |
Categories: [landscape & rural] [portfolio]
Comments
Leave a Comment
-
Share on Del.icio.us
RSS 2.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.