According to this New York Time’s article, film is back with a bang. So, pick up a 90s camera at a car boot sale for a few bob and start shooting!
I have been experimenting with infrared photography with the Efke IR820 Aura and Ilford SFX200 films. If you start looking into IR photography it can be a bit confusing at first. Googling the film name will probably yield lots of unexpected questions in forums and even more, seemingly, conflicting answers to these questions. While getting into infrared photography myself, I started to make sense of it slowly and wrote down my findings below; I hope that it helps you to get started too.
Photo above: Dovecot in the walled garden, Eastcote House Gardens. Efke IR820 Aura f/11, 0.5 seconds, filter: Hoya R72; Developed in APH 09 1:40 for 11 minutes. Agitation: 2 inversions every 30 seconds.
At the moment of writing, I think only two infrared films are available and several more films that have extended sensitivity to red:
Efke IR820 available in normal and AURA versions. The latter doesn’t have an anti-halation layer and can create some interesting effects when the light reflects off the back of the camera. This film is also sold under the name Maco IR820c Precision Infrared film. ** update: This film is no longer available after the Fotokemika factory in Croatia shut down **
Ilford SFX200 film which isn’t a true infrared film but does have some extended sensitivity to infrared up to 740nm.
Rollei Retro 80S is also red sensitive to 750nm which puts it in the same class as the Ilford SFX200 film.
Ilford Delta 3200
The popular Kodak HIE film has been discontinued in 2008, unfortunately.
The use of a filter is required to bring out the sensitivity of the film to red light. If you were to use an infrared sensitive film without any filter, you can expect a normal black and white photo.
Some people recommend a normal red filter, like the 25A as is used in black and white photography, but I would recommend buying one of the special infrared filters like the Hoya R72 or the IR-720 filter to maximize the effect. Both filters block all wavelengths shorter than 720nm to only let the infrared light through. The problem is that the filter will appear opaque to the eye so you will need to do all focussing before putting the filter on the lens. I usually focus, put the lens in manual focus mode if it is an auto focus lens and proceed by putting the filter in front of the lens.
Ilford does make the Ilford SFX200 filter available but I didn’t have good results with that filter in combination with the Ilford SFX200 film, the results I got with SFX200 film in combination with a Hoya R72 filter were much better.
There are other, stronger infrared filters available, but do make sure that the filter still passes through light for which the film you are using is sensitive, or else you will end up with no image.
As the result of an infrared photo is quite unpredictable and you cannot chimp on an SLR, I would certainly recommend bracketing each shot at least +1 and -1 stop.
As the filters usually recommended with infrared film are blocking out so much light, the exposure needs to be corrected. For example the filter factor for the Hoya R72 filter is 16 which translates into 4 stops.
If you are using an external light meter or would like to use the TTL lightmeter on your camera before putting on the filter, the clever thing to do is to take the filter factor into consideration when setting the EI of the film on the meter or camera. For example, the boxspeed of the Efke film is 100 ISO, to take the filter factor into consideration, you would set the EI at the meter at 6 ISO (100-50-25-12-6) and then you can set the recommended exposure time for the aperture used manually on the camera.
If your camera has TTL metering, you could use the camera settings of the exposure after you put the filter on the lens, in that case leave the ISO settings on the camera at the boxspeed of the film. This could be a bit of a gamble as it is possible that the lightmeter your camera uses is not (very) sensitive to the light that passes the filter which may result in bad exposures. You’ll need to experiment to find out.
Another option is to use the various rules of thumb you can find. I did some research and found that the recommended starting exposure for Efke IR820 is 0.5 seconds at f/11 for a bright sunny day. This is also a good way to find out how your camera TTL lightmeter works: if the camera recommends something close to this under these circumstances, it is likely that the lightmeter of your camera works fine with this filter.
If you have manual focus lenses you might have noticed the red line/dot/diamond that is located just to the left of the centre of the lens in the area that usually lists the different apertures and that you may have used to maximize the depth of field for a given aperture. As infrared light with its long wavelength focuses slightly differently from visible light, you need to adjust the focus a bit after you focused for the visible light unless your lens is marked as APO. The idea is that after focussing and optionally correcting for the depth of field, you turn the focus ring to the left such that the point of the focus ring that was in the centre of the lens now aligns with the red line/dot/diamond.
Unfortunately this is usually not possible for auto focus lenses. In that case you will need to solve the problem by selecting an aperture such that the object you want to focus on is included in the depth of field. However, be aware that infrared light will increase any lens diffraction so it is recommended to not automatically select the smallest of apertures. Keep it at f/11 or f/16, I would say, and avoid f/22 or f/32.
Be very careful when loading infrared film as it is easily fogged. Surprisingly enough, it is the 35mm versions of these films that are in danger of fogging the most. The felt in the light trap of a 35mm film cartridge is not infrared opaque and loading the film in any other place but a dark room could easily spoil the first few exposures.
Beware of unexpected light sources or leaks that can fog the film. For instance, my Pentax 645NII camera imprints exposure data on the edge of the negatives and this did fog the Efke film I was using. Plastic development tanks and plastic backs of cameras are usually safe to use, but note that the transparent window in the back of some 35mm cameras that shows the film information on the cartridge inside can be a cause of fogging and it would be probably best to cover it up with some aluminium foil and tape.
Note that infrared film is not sensitive to heat radiation, it doesn’t supply night vision or heat vision. Heat is indeed infrared radiation but with wavelengths far longer than the wavelengths in the sensitive area of the film. This is a good thing, probably, as otherwise we could only shoot infrared film from very expensive cameras with extensive cooling. The infrared films register the infrared radiation from light sources as it is reflected from the different subjects. For instance, chlorophyll in leaves absorbs the ultraviolet light and reflects most of the infrared light which results in leaves turning almost white on infrared film.
Still, you should develop exposed infrared film as quickly as possible, preferably on the same day as waiting longer than necessary will only increase the risk of increased base fog on the negatives. And, like any other film, do store infrared film in a cool place before use, preferably a freezer.
I’m preparing for a three weeks stay in Kawagoe (Saitama), Japan and decided the bring the bulk of the film I will be needing with me. It will all be 120 roll film as I will only bring my Pentax 645NII camera and its lenses. I bought three boxes of Fuji Acros 100 for general use, a handful of Fujichrome Velvia 50 for landscapes and a random collection of rolls of Ilford HP5+, Fujichrome Xperia 400 and an expired roll of Fuji Neopan 400. I decided against bringing my favourite ADOX CHS 25 ART as I will be shooting handheld, I will be leaving my sturdy tripod at home as it is just too heavy.
As I will be flying from Heathrow Airport, I checked their Advice for Photographers and they claim anything below ISO 400 is safe in their hand luggage scanners. They do make it clear that film cannot be packed into the hold as those scanners are far more powerful. I knew that already, but it is good they point it out.
I also checked the information on the Narita webpages, the airport for Tokyo, and they claim that film up to ISO 1600 can be brought through the carry-on luggage scanners. I do wonder about that claim in the post-9/11 world and this might be slightly out-dated information.
I have brought 35mm film through customs in my hand luggage before and had it scanned without any issues but it is the first time I bring 120 roll film and I do hope that the people operating the scanners will (still) recognize it as film especially as I intend to bring the plastic containers that ADOX uses for its film to store my exposed rolls and prevent any accidental exposure.
Update: I have now returned from my trip and have not had any problems with the film (up to ISO 400) that I had brought with me and that I put through the handluggage scanners. Good to see that in post 9/11 airports, film can still be brought on the plane without any problems.
At the start of May, the Canalway Cavalcade 2012 was held in the area of London between Paddington Station and Warwick Avenue better known as Little Venice.
It is the point where the Paddington Arm of the Grand Union Canal meets the Regents Canal and every year, since 1983, a festival is organized at this location showcasing the beautiful boats, boating skill and lots of people in most interesting outfits allowing for some cool street photography.
All photos shot on Fuji Neopan Acros 100 at EI 100, developed in APH 09 1:80 for 19 minutes. Agitation: 2 inversions every minute.
If you ask a random person to describe the Dutch countryside, 99 times out of 100 they will mention cows in a field that is so flat, you could play snooker on it. I used to live on the Veluwe, a forest-rich ridge of hills in the province of Gelderland. This is where the place the polar ice sheets stopped during the Saale Ice Age before retreating and leaving the deposits behind.
To me, the fields with cows are just as foreign as to you. One of the most interesting places around where I grew up was Kootwijkerzand, a 7km2 large area of sand dunes and Scots Pines. The area was lucky enough to be too poor to be turned into grasslands and it stayed like it was since the Ice Age for a long time. Unfortunately, due to the larger amounts of nitrogen in the atmosphere due to the increased traffic, the previously infertile dunes now can sustain mosses and trees which are now cut back regularly to keep the unique landscape.
It was this empty area that the authorities picked as the location to build the huge radio station to keep in contact with the colonies in 1922. I do remember the huge aerial on the roof which was torn down in 1980.
I have created a Facebook group for stand development, if you are interested in the process, please join me here.
If you have problems using the +1 button on webpages outside of Google+, like this one, and you are using Chrome: Google managed to break Chrome for its own +1 code in the latest version of Chrome if you block third-party cookies (which IMO is something that is a must). Hopefully Google will provide an update or bypass soon.
Last week I felt I needed some exercise and decided to follow one of the circular walks as described on the Colne Valley Park website. We had gone round a few years before in Spring and been amazed by the yellow rapeseed fields, but this time the walk was going to be in the snow.
I was really having a great time in the snow when I came across a tree all by itself in a large field just off the M25 motorway. I had been scouting for a tree like that late last year, but hadn’t spotted the ideal tree yet and now it was right in front of me. The composition that spoke to me most came together when several fences forming a triangle in the bottom half of the photo with the tree standing all alone in the top half of the photo, sort of resting on the triangle.
Driving on the M1 in the area of Nottingham, the Ratcliffe-on-Soar Power Station is difficult to miss. I had noticed it on our trips to the Peak District and earlier this week I decided to drive up there to see what I could capture on film. I have to confess, I do know that these kind of coal powered power stations are a disaster for the environment but I do love the contrast of the concrete cooling towers in the middle of nowhere. I know that Michael Kenna came up to shoot here, so I’m not alone.
If you look up the Ratcliffe-on-Soar Power Station in Google Earth (February 2012), you get some old aerial photos presented which don’t show the East Midlands Parkway railway station that has been constructed just next to the power station in 2009 and which has opened up the whole area. You can trust the road and roundabouts drawn in the middle of some trees and a field in Google Earth. I was really surprised how close you can get to the cooling towers. A great location, recommended!
Directions: Follow the M1 until J24, exit the motorway and follow the signs to the train station down the A453 and exit left once you arrive at the power station.
One of the problems I have always had was how to find great photo locations while having little time to spend in a town or country. A Travel Guide will give you the obvious shots, but limiting myself to those I never found satisfying. The solution I found is to scan the area to which I intend to travel in Google Earth and inspect those little blue markers that indicate uploaded photos in Panoramio. If I find something I like, I note the latitude and longitude and enter those as waypoints (favourites) in my GPS unit.
I quickly learned to zoom in a lot as the larger, more popular blue markers in Google Earth, for some inexplicable reason, always seem to contain the least interesting of photos. My guess is that the larger markers point to the photos Panoramio started off with and therefore have collected a lot of hits over the years especially during the period when few photos were uploaded. By the way, the red markers in Google Earth contain 360° panoramas and are certainly worth clicking through on to scout for locations as well.
To keep the system going, I have uploaded some of my photos to Panoramio which is the site Google uses to allow people to upload geotagged photos to Google Earth. Please have a look at the photos I uploaded.
Update: Sometimes it is quicker to use the Panoramio pages directly and browse to area of interest via their maps. Depending on how far you have zoomed in, most photos will show up in miniature on the map and a panel on the left hand side lists the most popular photos. This way you avoid clicking on all the blue icons in Google Earth and only inspect those photos that catch your eye; all in all, a much faster process.