Am I the only person who finds that the Yahoo provided maps in flickr are very poor for certain countries? On the satellite or hybrid maps I cannot zoom into a level where I can recognize where I have shot my photos anywhere in Saitama, Japan or plenty of other locations around the world. And, half of the locations I try to search for aren’t recognized. Thankfully LightRoom 4 includes a Map facility based on Google maps that works as one would expect. Flickr, why offer half a service?
Yesterday, I visited the Meiji Shrine and Yoyogi Park. I have been to Tokyo many times before and I do like to drop in on the places I visited before. We dropped in on the garden of the Empress Shoken which was in full flower. The irises where a little droopy after the recent typhoon and excessive rain of the last few days and that must have frustrated the several people painting the flowers as it would make their efforts look like cheap aquarelles had they painted according nature. I had loaded colour film for the occasion and am looking forward to some nice photos, especially of the people painting the flowers.
We continued to the Meiji Shrine and it was wedding ceremony rush hour: For the day we visited, there were 18 weddings scheduled and during the 45 minutes we spent there, we saw 5 or 6 weddings, I lost count. I had a chat with one of the guards and he pulled out a large schedule with lots of information as to what shrine area the wedding took place, etc. I also had a chat with a Miko and she said that this time of the year was most popular which surprises me a little as it is supposed to be the rainy season. The ceremony is 1530000 yen in the weekend (40 persons) or 980000 yen (20 persons) but weekdays are a bargain at 380000 yen.
What surprised me the most was that all the bridegrooms looked like they were 20 or 22 years old at most, so young!!
Notable fact: The Meiji Shrine wedding photographer uses two Pentax 67 cameras for his work!
We left the Shrine area and turned around to visit Yoyogi Park. This is an excellent area for a wannabe street photographer like me. It is very easy to walk up to the performers and either point at your camera or ask “shashin totte mo ii desu ka?” Invariably you’ll get a nod in agreement. I think the language barrier makes things even easier for once. Took some nice photos of saxophone players and drummers working some amazing rhythm on some African drums. While we were enjoying the atmosphere, the park guards rode their bikes up to the drummers and made them stop playing. Really too bad. I had a chat with the guys afterwards and they told me the guards were just doing their job. I was expecting them to be a bit more defiant, but they appeared to accept their fate without too much resentment. I told them that I didn’t really understand the logic of the guards, everybody visiting that area of the Yoyogi Park comes there for the spectacle and why pick on some awesome music? They wouldn’t byte, but when I left I noted that they had started playing again. I guess it is just a friendly game with the guards as long as you play it the right way and don’t come on strong as my natural reaction would have been. Lesson learned!
The photo on the right is of a professional saxophonist from Mali practising against a wall in the park, I guess he couldn’t practise at home. Two would-be-street-photographers were stalking him from a short distance. The guy looked amiable enough so I walked up to him and had a chat about Jazz music and favourite artists and finally I asked if I could photograph him while practising. He nodded and started jamming again. I took my shots, thanked him and nodded to the two other photographers on my way back who had watched the exchange with a bit of surprise. Street photography is so easy in Japan!
Inspired by a great blog post by Lee Chapman on his TokyoTimes.org blog, we dropped by the Iseya restaurant in Kichijoji, Tokyo. It is located on the Kichijoji exit of the Inogashira park that also includes the Ghibli Museum, so you might find yourself visiting a location closer to this restaurant than you would think.
It is a yakitori and sukiyaki restaurant and the grilled chicken is great with a couple of cold draught beers. The place is dirty and full of character and the patrons are a nice mix of Japanese society. Quite different from most of the restaurants a tourist usually ends up in and therefore heartily recommended.
Personally I love these kind of gritty places, I prefer to visit a salarymen lair above another one of those chain restaurants you find everywhere. The problem is that these kind of old restaurants are quickly disappearing, even Iseya which was damaged in the March 2011 earthquake will soon close for renovations. It will close 8 July 2012 and reopen next year.
As lots of people want to capture the restaurant as it was before it closes for renovation, the place appears to be packed most of the days, be prepared to queue outside for a bit. The good thing is that it is open non-stop from noon till 10PM.
Lee’s blog post contained a great photographic reportage and I was inspired by it. I have mainly shot film on my Pentax 645NII camera this trip, but yesterday I brought my Pentax K20D DSLR with my Sigma 20mm f/1.8 EX DG Aspherical lens and cranked the ISO settings up to 3200, while I usually keep it at 100 ISO.
The results are some very noisy photos that converted brilliantly into grainy black and white images in Adobe LightRoom.
For the first three images in this blog post, I managed to stitch several photos together to get the wide angle and space that I do prefer for this kind of work. Click through on the images to get a larger version.
According to this New York Time’s article, film is back with a bang. So, pick up a 90s camera at a car boot sale for a few bob and start shooting!
I have been experimenting with infrared photography with the Efke IR820 Aura and Ilford SFX200 films. If you start looking into IR photography it can be a bit confusing at first. Googling the film name will probably yield lots of unexpected questions in forums and even more, seemingly, conflicting answers to these questions. While getting into infrared photography myself, I started to make sense of it slowly and wrote down my findings below; I hope that it helps you to get started too.
Photo above: Dovecot in the walled garden, Eastcote House Gardens. Efke IR820 Aura f/11, 0.5 seconds, filter: Hoya R72; Developed in APH 09 1:40 for 11 minutes. Agitation: 2 inversions every 30 seconds.
At the moment of writing, I think only two infrared films are available and several more films that have extended sensitivity to red:
Efke IR820 available in normal and AURA versions. The latter doesn’t have an anti-halation layer and can create some interesting effects when the light reflects off the back of the camera. This film is also sold under the name Maco IR820c Precision Infrared film. ** update: This film is no longer available after the Fotokemika factory in Croatia shut down **
Ilford SFX200 film which isn’t a true infrared film but does have some extended sensitivity to infrared up to 740nm.
Rollei Retro 80S is also red sensitive to 750nm which puts it in the same class as the Ilford SFX200 film.
Ilford Delta 3200
The popular Kodak HIE film has been discontinued in 2008, unfortunately.
The use of a filter is required to bring out the sensitivity of the film to red light. If you were to use an infrared sensitive film without any filter, you can expect a normal black and white photo.
Some people recommend a normal red filter, like the 25A as is used in black and white photography, but I would recommend buying one of the special infrared filters like the Hoya R72 or the IR-720 filter to maximize the effect. Both filters block all wavelengths shorter than 720nm to only let the infrared light through. The problem is that the filter will appear opaque to the eye so you will need to do all focussing before putting the filter on the lens. I usually focus, put the lens in manual focus mode if it is an auto focus lens and proceed by putting the filter in front of the lens.
Ilford does make the Ilford SFX200 filter available but I didn’t have good results with that filter in combination with the Ilford SFX200 film, the results I got with SFX200 film in combination with a Hoya R72 filter were much better.
There are other, stronger infrared filters available, but do make sure that the filter still passes through light for which the film you are using is sensitive, or else you will end up with no image.
As the result of an infrared photo is quite unpredictable and you cannot chimp on an SLR, I would certainly recommend bracketing each shot at least +1 and -1 stop.
As the filters usually recommended with infrared film are blocking out so much light, the exposure needs to be corrected. For example the filter factor for the Hoya R72 filter is 16 which translates into 4 stops.
If you are using an external light meter or would like to use the TTL lightmeter on your camera before putting on the filter, the clever thing to do is to take the filter factor into consideration when setting the EI of the film on the meter or camera. For example, the boxspeed of the Efke film is 100 ISO, to take the filter factor into consideration, you would set the EI at the meter at 6 ISO (100-50-25-12-6) and then you can set the recommended exposure time for the aperture used manually on the camera.
If your camera has TTL metering, you could use the camera settings of the exposure after you put the filter on the lens, in that case leave the ISO settings on the camera at the boxspeed of the film. This could be a bit of a gamble as it is possible that the lightmeter your camera uses is not (very) sensitive to the light that passes the filter which may result in bad exposures. You’ll need to experiment to find out.
Another option is to use the various rules of thumb you can find. I did some research and found that the recommended starting exposure for Efke IR820 is 0.5 seconds at f/11 for a bright sunny day. This is also a good way to find out how your camera TTL lightmeter works: if the camera recommends something close to this under these circumstances, it is likely that the lightmeter of your camera works fine with this filter.
If you have manual focus lenses you might have noticed the red line/dot/diamond that is located just to the left of the centre of the lens in the area that usually lists the different apertures and that you may have used to maximize the depth of field for a given aperture. As infrared light with its long wavelength focuses slightly differently from visible light, you need to adjust the focus a bit after you focused for the visible light unless your lens is marked as APO. The idea is that after focussing and optionally correcting for the depth of field, you turn the focus ring to the left such that the point of the focus ring that was in the centre of the lens now aligns with the red line/dot/diamond.
Unfortunately this is usually not possible for auto focus lenses. In that case you will need to solve the problem by selecting an aperture such that the object you want to focus on is included in the depth of field. However, be aware that infrared light will increase any lens diffraction so it is recommended to not automatically select the smallest of apertures. Keep it at f/11 or f/16, I would say, and avoid f/22 or f/32.
Be very careful when loading infrared film as it is easily fogged. Surprisingly enough, it is the 35mm versions of these films that are in danger of fogging the most. The felt in the light trap of a 35mm film cartridge is not infrared opaque and loading the film in any other place but a dark room could easily spoil the first few exposures.
Beware of unexpected light sources or leaks that can fog the film. For instance, my Pentax 645NII camera imprints exposure data on the edge of the negatives and this did fog the Efke film I was using. Plastic development tanks and plastic backs of cameras are usually safe to use, but note that the transparent window in the back of some 35mm cameras that shows the film information on the cartridge inside can be a cause of fogging and it would be probably best to cover it up with some aluminium foil and tape.
Note that infrared film is not sensitive to heat radiation, it doesn’t supply night vision or heat vision. Heat is indeed infrared radiation but with wavelengths far longer than the wavelengths in the sensitive area of the film. This is a good thing, probably, as otherwise we could only shoot infrared film from very expensive cameras with extensive cooling. The infrared films register the infrared radiation from light sources as it is reflected from the different subjects. For instance, chlorophyll in leaves absorbs the ultraviolet light and reflects most of the infrared light which results in leaves turning almost white on infrared film.
Still, you should develop exposed infrared film as quickly as possible, preferably on the same day as waiting longer than necessary will only increase the risk of increased base fog on the negatives. And, like any other film, do store infrared film in a cool place before use, preferably a freezer.
I’m preparing for a three weeks stay in Kawagoe (Saitama), Japan and decided the bring the bulk of the film I will be needing with me. It will all be 120 roll film as I will only bring my Pentax 645NII camera and its lenses. I bought three boxes of Fuji Acros 100 for general use, a handful of Fujichrome Velvia 50 for landscapes and a random collection of rolls of Ilford HP5+, Fujichrome Xperia 400 and an expired roll of Fuji Neopan 400. I decided against bringing my favourite ADOX CHS 25 ART as I will be shooting handheld, I will be leaving my sturdy tripod at home as it is just too heavy.
As I will be flying from Heathrow Airport, I checked their Advice for Photographers and they claim anything below ISO 400 is safe in their hand luggage scanners. They do make it clear that film cannot be packed into the hold as those scanners are far more powerful. I knew that already, but it is good they point it out.
I also checked the information on the Narita webpages, the airport for Tokyo, and they claim that film up to ISO 1600 can be brought through the carry-on luggage scanners. I do wonder about that claim in the post-9/11 world and this might be slightly out-dated information.
I have brought 35mm film through customs in my hand luggage before and had it scanned without any issues but it is the first time I bring 120 roll film and I do hope that the people operating the scanners will (still) recognize it as film especially as I intend to bring the plastic containers that ADOX uses for its film to store my exposed rolls and prevent any accidental exposure.
Update: I have now returned from my trip and have not had any problems with the film (up to ISO 400) that I had brought with me and that I put through the handluggage scanners. Good to see that in post 9/11 airports, film can still be brought on the plane without any problems.
At the start of May, the Canalway Cavalcade 2012 was held in the area of London between Paddington Station and Warwick Avenue better known as Little Venice.
It is the point where the Paddington Arm of the Grand Union Canal meets the Regents Canal and every year, since 1983, a festival is organized at this location showcasing the beautiful boats, boating skill and lots of people in most interesting outfits allowing for some cool street photography.
All photos shot on Fuji Neopan Acros 100 at EI 100, developed in APH 09 1:80 for 19 minutes. Agitation: 2 inversions every minute.
If you ask a random person to describe the Dutch countryside, 99 times out of 100 they will mention cows in a field that is so flat, you could play snooker on it. I used to live on the Veluwe, a forest-rich ridge of hills in the province of Gelderland. This is where the place the polar ice sheets stopped during the Saale Ice Age before retreating and leaving the deposits behind.
To me, the fields with cows are just as foreign as to you. One of the most interesting places around where I grew up was Kootwijkerzand, a 7km2 large area of sand dunes and Scots Pines. The area was lucky enough to be too poor to be turned into grasslands and it stayed like it was since the Ice Age for a long time. Unfortunately, due to the larger amounts of nitrogen in the atmosphere due to the increased traffic, the previously infertile dunes now can sustain mosses and trees which are now cut back regularly to keep the unique landscape.
It was this empty area that the authorities picked as the location to build the huge radio station to keep in contact with the colonies in 1922. I do remember the huge aerial on the roof which was torn down in 1980.
I have created a Facebook group for stand development, if you are interested in the process, please join me here.
If you have problems using the +1 button on webpages outside of Google+, like this one, and you are using Chrome: Google managed to break Chrome for its own +1 code in the latest version of Chrome if you block third-party cookies (which IMO is something that is a must). Hopefully Google will provide an update or bypass soon.